• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

The SHOW: Airlines still a "good gig"??

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor
Yeah, with that wing in HAL’s pix, I wonder if they could even rotate and get airborne.
I don’t have the knowledges on anything that size, but I wonder what you happen if they got just enough lift and the the snow slipped off one wind and not the other? Would you compensate with splitting engine power or trying to force the lighter wing back to level?
 

zipmartin

Never been better
pilot
Contributor
On a different note, things that make you say WTF! Recent Incident, don't know which airline. In the future, I think I'm going to start sending my FO back for a peek at the wings before I taxi after deicing.
That was SOP for us when I was still flying. Walk the isle looking out the windows and open the rear entry doors to check the tail. If it was dark, you took your flashlight to check the tail.
 

HAL Pilot

Well-Known Member
None
Contributor
There is a bridge in DC that can tell you “rest of the story.”

For you youngsters, Air Florida flight 90. However it was engine ice not wing ice that did them in.

After that crash the joke going around was
"Ladies and Gentlemen this is the Captain. The bad news is that we're going to have to stop for ice. The good news is that the drinks are on the house..."
 

Jim123

DD-214 in hand and I'm gonna party like it's 1998
pilot
Ryan 590 was another one where the aerodynamics might make a decent comparison. Cargo DC-9 with ice on top of the wings, barely made it off the ground but couldn't fly. There are some technical differences, its ice was inflight icing from the prior leg and it was very thin (although a pile of snow can always hide a thin layer of ice and/or have a thin layer at the wing's surface thaw and refreeze), the crew didn't get the airplane deiced (didn't think they needed to because they didn't see the accumulation on top of the wings/didn't look for it either- night, fatigue), and the accident report gets into some esoteric stuff about slatless airfoils (all but the smallest, oldest regional jets and business jets have slats nowadays).

It's hard to say exactly what would have happened, not without physically climbing on top of that wing in the picture and clearing it off down to the paint, soon after the picture was taken, to see everything. Exactly what though, it would have been bad.

When you know all the rules, regulations, and procedures, it's simply amazing that the guy in the truck holding the sprayer would be this grossly negligent. Or maybe he or she is just that stupid and it's a supervisory issue. It's sorta like if you were a tire jockey on your first day and in the interview it should have come out that you'd never picked up a wrench in your life- and the boss says go put that wheel back on that car but provides zero training, supervision, or watches what you're doing and turns the keys over to the customer.
 
Last edited:

DanMa1156

Is it baseball season yet?
pilot
Contributor
Exactly my point lmao. When there are 5 legit, and one air force training command in the same local area, ATC is telling us when they next want to hear from us. If I were an airline guy, I'd report established. When I'm one out of 5 military aircraft holding at SQWID at KMOB "for training," won't, if I were told to report when ready to commence the approach. I actually tell my students to just ask their instructor before reporting; being recently flight-side I would rip the PCL from their thumb when they tried to do it.

Mobile Approach does not want to give legit holding clearances to 75 planes per hour. Which is why they don't. They don't give me an EFC, they tell me to report when ready to commence the approach, that's what I do.

BONUS note: Sherman field doesn't give lost comm instructions during PARS! Probably a FAR.AIM violation. But they only do like 300 per day.

When I was there (HTs at least), I thought there was a specific exception in the FTI for the TRACON area... I was fine with my students who made a "simulated" call and told me they knew that rule.
 

FLGUY

“Technique only”
pilot
Contributor
When I was there (HTs at least), I thought there was a specific exception in the FTI for the TRACON area... I was fine with my students who made a "simulated" call and told me they knew that rule.

That exception is also actually written in the AIM. it’s something to the effect of “with the exception of military aircraft in military training areas”. I can’t remember the specific wording.
 

DanMa1156

Is it baseball season yet?
pilot
Contributor
That exception is also actually written in the AIM. it’s something to the effect of “with the exception of military aircraft in military training areas”. I can’t remember the specific wording.
Yup. I remember this now.
 

mad dog

the 🪨 🗒️ ✂️ champion
pilot
Contributor
Got this from a friend, seems too good to be true

30235
The chief of the 1980s wouldn’t lie...it’s gotta be true. :D

Man, I dig that song...all the way back to 1987 while an SNA in VT-2 and HT-8...trying to hook up with Susie Rotten Crotch in Milton, Pace or Pensacola. :D
 

FinkUFreaky

Well-Known Member
pilot
That exception is also actually written in the AIM. it’s something to the effect of “with the exception of military aircraft in military training areas”. I can’t remember the specific wording.
Good to know! I guess I'll have to look it up so I can no longer tell students "don't disregard the FTI/FAR/AIMs, but" and can instead tell them "Regard your AIM"
 
Top