Yawn. I said that McCain was very strong in those 2 major weaknesses of Obama's. If you want a president to pick a VP to tell him what to do in those VERY important matters (i.e. dealing with N Korea, Iran, Huego Chavez, ect) that's fine. I'm not trying to sway your vote; I could care less, it's your decision. -Trying to change someone's political opinions is like trying to change their religion, no less over the internet. I for one, though, will vote for the man that is actually capable of dealing with foreign matters on his own, and to that effect is better at doing so than Biden and Obama combined, IMO.
So you think that Obama is an expert in economics or the economy? Haha, that's a good argument: expanding our government, and socializing medicine among other things sounds great! Obama would be far worse for our economy than McCain, IMO. He didn't pick Palin to help him on the economy(-and I never said anything like that), unless you mean on energy's future (natural gas, drilling, pipelines and so forth). As Lazers said, there are economic experts that help him with that type of issue, as they would for Obama too (except in his case the whole legislative and executive branches would be democrats and he would ruin our economy with socialism and much more "big" gov't).
I am an independent. I vote how I choose to. IMO, Obama is nothing more than an good orator who slid his way into politics (very shady Chicago deals, then later in the senate only voting "present") specifically to run as a presidential candidate and is now only playing off of the liberal populations' hate for Bush. That got him this far, but I honestly don't think he will win it. McCain on the other hand is a proven leader and a courageous man that has already displayed his love for our country and his desire to fix things responsibly. You asked me to explain before, and I did again. --I guess you just wanted an argument. Again, yawn.