• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

What is it like to be an NFO?

TheBubba

I Can Has Leadership!
None
^ "They" ditched the back seat NATOPS check for ECMOs. Now, its just a stan check in the sim as the last event for CAT-1 studs going through VAQ-129. Once out of 129, you're just expected to know your sh*t when you strap on the jet.
 

picklesuit

Dirty Hinge
pilot
Contributor
Bubba thinks Pickle needs a whiz quiz. Seems like Pickle's been smoking something.

I will say the first part of Pickle's statement is correct... being an NFO is awesome. He does, however, need a little guidance on the second part. I'd have to say that being an NFO is more fun than being a pilot.

Hey pickle... you see the little blue line on your EHSI? Yeah.. shut up and follow it... (i keed, i keed)

Hey, this monkey knows how to fly to the banana...I just enjoy the perks of big windows, extra legroom, and the comfotable seats...

Plus my own rack...well, later, when I am actually worth something to my crew...

Pickle
 

nombrescreeno

New Member
I've heard this mentioned before, but is it true that NFO's have increasingly found their roles/jobs I guess one could say... "marginalized" by new technologies and plane design philosophies? And I don't mean that in a negative tone, as technology has made it undoubtedly easier for a single person to process a whole lot of information at once and thus manage their mission.

Don't get me wrong here - I don't mean that in negative terms, and I'm sure that the P-3, E-6, E-2 communities still have NFO's as the critical players. And there's a lot of good-natured rubbing between pilots and nfo's, but, like mentioned above, from the Prowler to the Growler going from 3 to 1 NFOs riding along and the pilot having more of a role over the mission... or such as the Rhino or the fact that future planes/designs have integrated a lot more of the funciton of the NFO into the pilot systems. It just seems that way form the outside, a lot of the philosophy in recent years in the design of recent and future planes has seen a decrease in the need of NFO's

edit: I also realize that a lot of this is what people also hear and deal with regards to UAVs and pilots...
 

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I've heard this mentioned before, but is it true that NFO's have increasingly found their roles/jobs I guess one could say... "marginalized" by new technologies and plane design philosophies? And I don't mean that in a negative tone, as technology has made it undoubtedly easier for a single person to process a whole lot of information at once and thus manage their mission.

Don't get me wrong here - I don't mean that in negative terms, and I'm sure that the P-3, E-6, E-2 communities still have NFO's as the critical players. And there's a lot of good-natured rubbing between pilots and nfo's, but, like mentioned above, from the Prowler to the Growler going from 3 to 1 NFOs riding along and the pilot having more of a role over the mission... or such as the Rhino or the fact that future planes/designs have integrated a lot more of the funciton of the NFO into the pilot systems. It just seems that way form the outside, a lot of the philosophy in recent years in the design of recent and future planes has seen a decrease in the need of NFO's

Many times, as the complexity and number of "systems" in an aircraft increases, so does the brainpower required to operate if effectively. Now, there's no doubt that technology has enabled aircrews to do more with less, like the Prowler's four aircrew going down to two in the Growler, but there's a limit even to that.

Brett
 

A4sForever

BTDT OLD GUY
pilot
Contributor
Why is everyone so afraid of 'hurting' the NFOs feelings to the extent that we super-tip-toe around this issue every 6 months or so with the 'don't get me wrong' comments that go on and on and on and on .... ???

Instead -- let's be honest, just for a change: NFO -- it's a great job.

It's the second best job in Naval Aviation.

Q.E.D.

Period.
 

flyersfan12

New Member
This is a great thread and really makes me appreciate the role of NFO's. I've been doing a ton of research lately and reading through the forums, and I understand the cut-off age for SNA is 26, with up to a 48-month waiver for current/former military. I have found alot less information about NFO's though, and is there a cut-off age for the SNFO program as well?


I'm in the process of doing my packet for BDCP and (assuming I'm selected) I would be finished OCS and commissioned when I'm 28.... in the event that I'm selected for SWO and not SNA or SNFO, what options would I have for changing my designator after commission? In that scenario, would I have to serve the full time of mandatory active duty before being able to request a different community?


Furthermore, if I were SWO and my designator-change request were granted before I'm 30, would I then be qualified for the 48-month age waiver for SNA?


(Like I mentioned, I've come across very little information about age-waivers,
and I have little idea about the types of circumstances they would be applicable for.)
 

Pugs

Back from the range
None
^ "They" ditched the back seat NATOPS check for ECMOs. Now, its just a stan check in the sim as the last event for CAT-1 studs going through VAQ-129. Once out of 129, you're just expected to know your sh*t when you strap on the jet.

Hmm, dating myself again. Thanks :D
 

P3 F0

Well-Known Member
None
what options would I have for changing my designator after commission? In that scenario, would I have to serve the full time of mandatory active duty before being able to request a different community?

Furthermore, if I were SWO and my designator-change request were granted before I'm 30, would I then be qualified for the 48-month age waiver for SNA?

(Like I mentioned, I've come across very little information about age-waivers,
and I have little idea about the types of circumstances they would be applicable for.)
If you go SWO, it is possible to redes, but you'll have to go through the entire SWO training, get to your ship, study/board/qualify and get your SWO pin, spend a bit of time establishing a good rep, then put in a package with the endorsement of your skipper. No one, to my knowledge, is going to endorse a package before you do any of that. So add on all of that time to your timeline--I'm guessing a good two years, maybe three, to get your pin and pay dues--you can probably find more accurate numbers in the SWO forum.

Also, to redes from anything else to pilot is probably the hardest (most competitive) way to go. Usually there are not many slots relative to the usual entries into the pipeline. I think when the NFO->Pilot program got reinstated a few years back, only a handful of guys (or maybe it was just one guy?) got picked up on the first pass.
 

flyersfan12

New Member
Thank you for the insight, I really appreciate it!

What about age cut-offs for the SNFO program? I know there's the age 26 cut-off for SNA, is it the same age for SNFO or is it older?
 

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Ah... it was only in the past couple years that change was made.... t least that's the story that I got.

If your Training Officer is doing his job, you should get a backseat stan-check annually - technique only. It's just that the whole thing has moved from the realm of NATOPS to PWTP/ACTC.

Brett
 

OscarMyers

Well-Known Member
None
Ill go ahead and bring this thread back to life instead of starting a new one. Im a STA 21 NFO selectee stationed at pax river. I figured id used this time in limbo while waiting for orders to do a little platform shopping. If there are any NFOs at pax with some free time to sit down and talk with me about what they do, I would be very appreciative.
 

helolumpy

Apprentice School Principal
pilot
Contributor
Speaking of VS... what is SSC? Some of the S-3 guys here talk of doing that in the Gulf.

Surface Survailance and Control. It's a term that fell out of usage a few years ago and was replaced by SUW (Surface Warfare) but has been steadily making it's way back into the vocabulary of aviators.
 

KilroyUSN

Prior EM1(SS) - LTJG - VP P-8 NFO COTAC
None
jetjockey105 has a great idea here because I have wanted to do the same thing!
If, for whatever reason, there are any NFO's in the Bremerton area, I would love to sit down and ask questions about life as an NFO in your community.
 

asa66

New Member
Times have changed.

For the more senior JO's yeah. But I was under the impression that the ground jobs are pretty watered down for the more junior guys until they get their quals up. That being said, I'm sure the reason for that is to allow for studying for said quals. But what do I know, I'm not there yet?

In my day there weren't enough hours in a day. When I checked into my first squadron, I was given four jobs, which was the average. Primary job was Line Division, which was filled with guys who had failed at something else and thus were dropped into the Line. Second job was to qual-up in the airplane as a P-3 NAV/TACCO. Third job was Coffee Mess Officer and it was serious. If we ran out of anything the other O's let me know about it. Fourth job was Condom Control Officer. Once we hit Iwakuni on our first deployment I had to supply the O's with condoms. I solved that one by buying a gross and then serializing them and requiring that they turn-in the old one if they wanted a fresh one. But a JO in aviation ran his butt off.
 
Top