Yep.Are you saying that in order to give advice about what makes a good officer you have to actually BE an officer??
Of course, you're free to speculate all you want on what are good officer traits and what aren't. Hell, feel free to speculate out loud here on the forum just as long as you understand (and ensure others do as well) that you are merely giving your opinion about what you think makes a good/bad officer.
This may come as a shock to you, but I have worked (and I assume others have as well) for officers that were absolutely great at what they did and loved working for them....BUT I did not respect them personally. On the flip side, I have worked for some that I really respected as a person but were not so great to work for. My point: officers are not necessarily representative of the person beneath the uniform.ryanber said:It's not about the uniform. It's about the individual beneath it.
It's a WHOLE 'nother world when you put those shiny bars on your collar and walk outside for the first time. I am not exaggerating one bit. Your information may not be completely illegit, but it certainly hasn't been put through the pressure cooker yet either. You will gain a different perspective and probably look back at the things you say now and laugh.ryanber said:I've known alot "Officer material" men...military and civilian. I've also known alot of "non-Officer material" men...civilian AND current military Officers. Just because someone wears the uniform doesn't make them legitimate sources of info. And just because someone doesn't wear the uniform doesn't mean that their information is illegit. Over