OCS 03Sep24 SNA/SNFO Board

[Maher1]

There is a thread for NOV 3. Request for the Group me.

November 3 SNFO. NOV 3 guys let’s make a thread/gc!?!?!

 

[WepInteg]

November 3 SNFO. NOV 3 guys let’s make a thread/gc!?!?!

https://www.airwarriors.com/community/forums/ocs-class-dates-and-information.48/

That's usually where the thread for specific OCS classes are created, usually a gc is coordinated in that thread also.

 

[Seckzyna172]

If anyone wants the results checked send me a message .

 

[tommy_the_k]

^^ The same is true for me. Any help would be appreciated!

Recruiter finally got back to me. SNA with report date of Dec 1

 

[23brooks23]

If anyone wants the results checked send me a message .

Can you see how many got selected out of the 120

 

[Seckzyna172]

Pilot 63
NFO 27

 

[23brooks23]

Pilot 63
NFO 27

Dang only 75% this board

 

[GoBoilers25]

I was going to say, were there really 120 people that were reviewed?

 

[AZ2AMDO]

If you cross reference the names, there are only two people who are not accepted for either SNA or SNFO. The majority of No's for Pilot were picked up for NFO, and vice versa. The No's for NFO were almost exclusively because the person was a yes for Pilot. Anyone with access to the list can cross check me.

I came up with:

Pilot
63 Pro Rec Yes
6 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

NFO
27 Pro Rec Yes
3 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

Not sure where the 120 number comes from but the list does not have 120 unique names.

If you take the 99 Yes verses a total of 101 names, that's some pretty good odds boys and girls

 

[GoBoilers25]

If you cross reference the names, there are only two people who are not accepted for either SNA or SNFO. The majority of No's for Pilot were picked up for NFO, and vice versa. The No's for NFO were almost exclusively because the person was a yes for Pilot. Anyone with access to the list can cross check me.

I came up with:

Pilot
63 Pro Rec Yes
6 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

NFO
27 Pro Rec Yes
3 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

Not sure where the 120 number comes from but the list does not have 120 unique names.

If you take the 99 Yes verses a total of 101 names, that's some pretty good odds boys and girls

There it is, Thank you for investigating. So, if I understand correctly, 99 out of 101 people were accepted?

 

[Seckzyna172]

Never gonna call an az a “LazY” ever again after that one . But damn these numbers are really good…

 

[AZ2AMDO]

There it is, Thank you for investigating. So, if I understand correctly, 99 out of 101 people were accepted?

That is correct. (Chris Farley's Voice)

Never gonna call an az a “LazY” ever again after that one . But damn these numbers are really good…

Appreciate you. AMDO has been letting me down, so i'm going for the Nov 4th Pilot/NFO board. Wish me luck.

 

[Seckzyna172]

That is correct. (Chris Farley's Voice)

Appreciate you. AMDO has been letting me down, so i'm going for the Nov 4th Pilot/NFO board. Wish me luck.

Where are you stationed right now ?

 

[AZ2AMDO]

Where are you stationed right now ?

PCU John F. Kennedy.

 

[WepInteg]

If you cross reference the names, there are only two people who are not accepted for either SNA or SNFO. The majority of No's for Pilot were picked up for NFO, and vice versa. The No's for NFO were almost exclusively because the person was a yes for Pilot. Anyone with access to the list can cross check me.

I came up with:

Pilot
63 Pro Rec Yes
6 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

NFO
27 Pro Rec Yes
3 BDCP Pro Rec Yes

Not sure where the 120 number comes from but the list does not have 120 unique names.

If you take the 99 Yes verses a total of 101 names, that's some pretty good odds boys and girls

My recruiter told me Friday he got a text saying everyone was accepted but I didn't know how true that was, seems like that was pretty much correct.