• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

1Nov2021 SNA/SNFO Board

Navy21

Navy21

OCS
Contributor
So… are we looking much better as a group of 301 applicants now that FY23 slots are open??? (FY22 + FY23 slots = normal/better selection rate?)

@exNavyOffRec, you stated earlier about those who don’t receive Pro-Rec-Y should x, y and z. What’s your new verdict given this information? Thanks
 
E

exNavyOffRec

Well-Known Member
Navy21 said:
So… are we looking much better as a group of 301 applicants now that FY23 slots are open??? (FY22 + FY23 slots = normal/better selection rate?)

@exNavyOffRec, you stated earlier about those who don’t receive Pro-Rec-Y should x, y and z. What’s your new verdict given this information? Thanks
Click to expand...
In reality that answer would be no, normally they don't start selecting for the next FY until March/April/May and the basis for the next FY numbers are off a percent of the current FY, the number for current FY is lower than last FY so that means fewer spots before hard goals are put out. If they are selecting those who will grad in May/June those are most likely FY 23, if they pick those that have already graduated for FY 23 then you are stealing from Peter to pay Paul and NRC will be in the same situation next year they are this year.

There is no way that some people going for SNA aren't going to get screwed, if NRC only selects grads for FY 22 to fix the numbers issue then a lot who submitted will get rejected, if they start selecting grads for FY 23 then those at the next board will be getting a lot of rejection.

If a person gets a no they should look at retesting if they have a lower PFAR.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top