Here's a question: Why doesn't the AF catch any bad press about the Osprey. Haven't they been using them operationally for longer than we have?
Have they thought about a Nacelle modification such as a deflector of some sort that could be actuated on demand - not to interfere with aerodynamics while in flight; i.e., NATOPS limited, used only while on deck at flight idle or ground taxi (so you don't torch taxiway lights)?
Umm...we already have that. It still doesn't reduce the heat enough for the older decks.
Here's a question: Why doesn't the AF catch any bad press about the Osprey. Haven't they been using them operationally for longer than we have?
Ahh, well roger that. Was that one of the Bravo mod's or has it always been on there?
The Marine Corps has been the first all along, both in fielding and deploying.
As far as why all the bad press is directed at the Corps, well the Marine Corps is the lead service on the program. Also, the USAF hasn't wrecked any of theirs.
After a spate of mishaps before Initial Operating Capability (IOC) was achieved, the program was getting bad press right and left. The program stopped flying after last mishap and conducted earnest effort to address its issues as part of the Return-to-Fly (RTF) effort. There hasn't been a mishap since and aircraft has deployed successfully. I would hardly characterize any press since thne as "Bad press". Relatively speaking, it's hardly a murmur compared to what it went through prior to RTF and successful resumption of flight test.
After a spate of mishaps before Initial Operating Capability (IOC) was achieved, the program was getting bad press right and left. The program stopped flying after last mishap and conducted earnest effort to address its issues as part of the Return-to-Fly (RTF) effort. There hasn't been a mishap since and aircraft has deployed successfully. I would hardly characterize any press since thne as "Bad press". Relatively speaking, it's hardly a murmur compared to what it went through prior to RTF and successful resumption of flight test.
I hear you, it just seems like many times when I read about what our Ospreys are doing and how they are performing above and beyond the article always closes out with something to the effect of "...is a controversial program in which over 30 Marines have been killed in throughout it's history." Heh, I've been hanging around the 'burt and see the AFSOC guys flying them around lately and thought to myself," You know, I haven't heard really anything bad about the AF flying Ospreys, yet I still talk to fellow Marines who say that the Osprey is a death trap they don't want to step foot in..." I guess maybe some of that is just ignorance in the face of change.
Well, no fatal mishaps anyways.
You should write mishap reports.