Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will be interesting to see the 22 doing HADR soon...
Haiti's so small the speed difference won't make that big of a dent, but if they use it as a intra-theatre connector between austere zones in Haiti, the airport, the LHA, LHD,
and maybe even a staging area in south FL,
it has the potential to make a much bigger contribution. I don't know if they're actually doing that or need that to be done, but I think that would be where they'd get some value-added out of it. You've got the COD to go from the airports to the carrier, but nothing that can hit all those areas without stopping and re-embarking the cargo.
With someone on the inside feeding me intel, that's one of the very real concerns of the planners...
And before phrogdriver weighs in and says "no worse than the 53", I can call bullshit now. I've been on the ground, under both... Osprey is worse. Let's see, rotor loading, aerodynamics, etc... Makes sense...
No, it doesn't have to be. I agree that the forces involved are the same, however - you end up taking the same amount of veritcal forces and distributing it along less surface area. Even if your measurements are correct, you are looking at the same forces distributed along 238.64 square feet, versus 260.62 square feet.
No, it doesn't have to be. I agree that the forces involved are the same, however - you end up taking the same amount of veritcal forces and distributing it along less surface area. Even if your measurements are correct, you are looking at the same forces distributed along 238.64 square feet, versus 260.62 square feet.
I hate the fact the Osprey is replacing the Phrog for a very personal reason (I want to keep flying throughout my reserve career, and the Osprey is going to force us to move, leading to me not being able to drill here any more), but I can also see its limitations. EVERY Osprey guy is incapable of seeing its limitations. EVERY Osprey guy. I actually heard an Osprey guy (who, oh - by the way, had less hours, less combat hours, and less goggle hours than I did) tell me that the Osprey has "No limitations."
That attitude will kill people. I don't give a fuck how good your aircraft is.
No, it doesn't have to be. I agree that the forces involved are the same, however - you end up taking the same amount of veritcal forces and distributing it along less surface area. Even if your measurements are correct, you are looking at the same forces distributed along 238.64 square feet, versus 260.62 square feet.
I hate the fact the Osprey is replacing the Phrog for a very personal reason (I want to keep flying throughout my reserve career, and the Osprey is going to force us to move, leading to me not being able to drill here any more), but I can also see its limitations. EVERY Osprey guy is incapable of seeing its limitations. EVERY Osprey guy. I actually heard an Osprey guy (who, oh - by the way, had less hours, less combat hours, and less goggle hours than I did) tell me that the Osprey has "No limitations."
That attitude will kill people. I don't give a fuck how good your aircraft is.
phrogpilot73 said:I hate the fact the Osprey is replacing the Phrog for a very personal reason
phrogpilot73 said:EVERY Osprey guy is incapable of seeing its limitations. EVERY Osprey guy.
Unlike most Phrog guys, you'll find that I'm open minded...
phrogpilot73 said:I actually heard an Osprey guy tell me that the Osprey has "No limitations."
phrogpilot73 said:Talk smack, and show us your plane, but don't be a dick about it!
Here's the most important question of this entire thread, which is more fun to fly? CH-46 or the MV-22?