Although the USAF loves CAS/A2G (I think; if I wasn't a recce guy, I'd want to be an A-10 pilot)...
I respectfully disagree. Or, more bluntly, HELL NO! The Air Force
hates their a-g mission. If it weren't for Congress and the Army continually stuffing it down their strategic-bombing/stealth-fighter obsessed throats, they'd drop it like it has a horrible disease, and the A-10's would have been scrap-yarded years ago. The only reason they're begrudgingly accepting their version of F-35's with the continuation of the a-g mission is because it gets them more money...oh, and because the costs are being spread-loaded to the Marines, Navy, Britain, and other U.S. affiliates.
Capt Morgan's said:
...unless of course they could be getting newer "C" airframes from Hickam, sometimes those PACAF boys keep some shiny toys around that could be trading material.
Those 'PACAF boys' are about to get the local ANG 20 new F-22's (supposedly 2011), but for the last couple decades they've been stuck with A-model F-15's, first block. Shiny toys to the pilots maybe, because the thrust/weight is so good, but I wouldn't exactly call 'em trading material.
And final note, I don't know where you guys are getting this measly little $250m price tag. I have it on record that the going rate for an F-22 is
$339 million per copy, when you include R&D and testing costs.