YOUR alternative is to let "them" think they can do this w/ impunity ... ??? Sorry, I think not; as that's what preceded the PUEBLO fiasco ... and many others.
As far as the "Bushie's" comment -- YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I'M REFERRING TO -- THE OBAMA ADMIN IS BEING TESTED ON MANY FRONTS AND THIS IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY. To date, I'm not impressed. You don't REALLY want to get into the disgraceful EP-3 thing again, do you ... ???
Flash ... you'll just never "get it". You're NOT a "fighter" ... probably never have been; you're just not wired that way.
One of the interesting things about working on the "Dark Side" of the business in this day and age (as Flash does) is the availability of information. It's somewhat amusing to watch uninformed speculation that can't be corrected or re-vectored because of INFOSEC and OPSEC rules, but that's just the way it is. There is more to this incident than is being discussed in the open source; there
will be no discussion of this additional information in this forum. Suffice it to say that the range of potential Chinese motivations behind this incident have been collected and assessed, using the information available, by those who are paid to do this sort of thing. A4S, you mention one of them - and only one. There is lots more to be said on this, just not in this forum. Tomorrow I will post in the AW high side folder for those interested.
Since Santayana said that those who do not remember history (or have selective memories...) are condemned to repeat it, I direct your attention to the Black Sea YORKTOWN/CARON "shouldering" incidents of 1988. For those with poor googling skills, tough - look it up. (Oh hell, who am I kidding - I'm supposed to provide info:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...0A25751C0A96E948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all) Here is a decent video link, though:
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-63119
After this incident, did President Reagan order the 6th Fleet guys to fire on the Soviets? No, that would be
poor judgement. That's not what nuclear armed nations do. The Russians were expressing displeasure with our exercising the right of innocent passage in the Black Sea. Diplomats then stepped in and did their thing, diplomatically.
Gamesmanship at sea has been carried on for a long time; this is just a new chapter. If you want to dive into the nitty-gritty of this sort of thing, check out a well-researched
Military Law Review piece here:
http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Military_Law_Review/pdf-files/276475~1.pdf
Lastly, I'm not sure how showing judgement and experience (as well as having a command of the situation well beyond a Fox News watcher) makes anyone less of a fighter, but what the hell do I know?