Wow, we haven’t even touched on the Freemasons here. I’m sure they are to blame, too. Maybe we can integrate them into FEMA, Big Pharma, and the Pentaverate.With reference to the former, I’ve kind of checked out…are we on Protocol 7 or 8?
Wow, we haven’t even touched on the Freemasons here. I’m sure they are to blame, too. Maybe we can integrate them into FEMA, Big Pharma, and the Pentaverate.With reference to the former, I’ve kind of checked out…are we on Protocol 7 or 8?
Wow, we haven’t even touched on the Freemasons here. I’m sure they are to blame, too. Maybe we can integrate them into FEMA, Big Pharma, and the Pentaverate.
When that happens, the 80% of people who get their news from the internet and not TV decide to
Honestly, I think it's mostly TikTok and Joe Rogan podcasts these days.I think you just, potentially unwittingly, highlighted what has gone wrong in our society. Idiots who think that an internet search equates to fact. And that is the treasure trove that we handed over to the SVR and every other bad actor out there.
The problem is DC is run by a bunch of 60+ year old men with an inflated sense of importance who pearl clutch over adopting any sort of change, because change threatens the fundamental framework of business rules that they leveraged to success. Bill Clinton famously remarked that he sent one email during his entire Presidency just to test the system ... he held office until the year 2000. In a government that leads adopting technology, Ronald Reagan should have been using email.I think you just, potentially unwittingly, highlighted what has gone wrong in our society. Idiots who think that an internet search equates to fact. And that is the treasure trove that we handed over to the SVR and every other bad actor out there.
This is a disingenuous argument.
Yes, if you dig through government documents you can find the U.S. policy going back over a decade. I don't think that's what robav8er was referring to.
The White House has a press secretary. The DoD has a public affairs department. Wouldn't it be great if they engaged U.S. mainstream media (MSM) with actual facts instead of waiting for them to release headlines about Russia "claiming" that Ukraine had bioweapons?....This is not a success of Russian propaganda. It's a failure of U.S. government media relations.
And to the extent that Russia invaded Ukraine over bioweapons...no, that's US propaganda. Russia invaded Ukraine because it a) believes Ukraine is Russian and b) because Ukraine was negotiating alliances with the west. The presence of bio-research facilities is merely a piece of substantiating evidence of that alliance.
With reference to the former, I’ve kind of checked out…are we on Protocol 7 or 8?
It's weird to me that the draft age wasn't already 18. They're fighting an existential threat to their nation. I don't know what the upper bounds of their draft age limit are.UKR drastically lowering age for conscription to 18 YO.
Support for the Vietnam War plummeted and the anti war movement got kicked into overdrive when college draft deferments began to evaporate and young more affluent( could afford college) people were being sent off to war. I wouldn't be surprised if the draft age is as high as it is to keep from inciting young people to oppose the war, and prevent pictures of peach fuzzed faces dead on the battlefield eroding supportIt's weird to me that the draft age wasn't already 18. They're fighting an existential threat to their nation. I don't know what the upper bounds of their draft age limit are.
Meanwhile RUS is throwing drunk 60 yr olds and unsuspecting foreign conscripts into the meat grinder...
I know Wikipedia isn't an overall authoritative source, but this article does a good job of explaining how the 'bioweapons labs" Russian propaganda seeped into some US right-wing media (and who those characters are)
Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
You can't say I'm just explaining disinformation that RUS used as a pretense for invasion...then throw up your hands at the end, and say who knows?, bc you also believe in some dubious claims about Fa
It’s more about demographics than anything else. In the 90s to early 2000s (post fall of USSR) birth rates plummeted.Support for the Vietnam War plummeted and the anti war movement got kicked into overdrive when college draft deferments began to evaporate and young more affluent( could afford college) people were being sent off to war. I wouldn't be surprised if the draft age is as high as it is to keep from inciting young people to oppose the war, and prevent pictures of peach fuzzed faces dead on the battlefield eroding support
I get your point. I'd just counter that Vietnam wasn't a war for national survival, while this one is.Support for the Vietnam War plummeted and the anti war movement got kicked into overdrive when college draft deferments began to evaporate and young more affluent( could afford college) people were being sent off to war. I wouldn't be surprised if the draft age is as high as it is to keep from inciting young people to oppose the war, and prevent pictures of peach fuzzed faces dead on the battlefield eroding support
Yeah, if I was a 24yo Ukrainian, I’m not sure how I could sleep at night working as a software engineer in Lviv while a bunch of 40yo conscripts are warming soup in a can on the front line.I get your point. I'd just counter that Vietnam wasn't a war for national survival, while this one is.