snow85 said:and this is NOT what you said to me via PM.
Perhaps you are the one who is not reading things completely...never the less I am done with this pointless squabble...
snow85 said:and this is NOT what you said to me via PM.
And the plot thickens!snow85 said:and this is NOT what you said to me via PM.
Brett327 said:And the plot thickens!
Brett
snow85 said:and this is NOT what you said to me via PM.
jamnww said:Hitting the high points...I said:
1) Looting bad, especially when none essential stuff (essentials are grey area)
2) Many who couldn't evac couldn't due to financial reasons as well as health
As for the part about rights, well I didn't hit that but wish I had. Read your PMs. Now I really am done with this squabble...
as far as selling things, did you read what i wrote? to people who have cash on them, in other words, in exchange for cash. doesn't it strike you as odd that they're stealing electronics when they have no home, and no electricity to use them? how rational is that? what usually happens to those items? they get sold on the black market, or pawned. for what? cash.
a man shoots at a military helicopter from the roof of his house. there is nothing but water around him. they may or may not be able to see him. they've been trained, aka military, to work under fire. this person doesn't have a clue about shooting at helicopters, no military training. is he shooting at them because he DOESN'T want them to pick him up off of his sinking house? is he wrong?
furthermore, you're in front of a computer. do you know what that tells me? you in a place with electricity, access to the world, probably air conditioning. which means that you're not on bourbon street. you can be as mad and frustrated with me as you want. i still maintain what i said-- you've lost your history, possibly family members, etc. but you personally, still have a comfortable bed to sleep in tonight. i live in texas, but do you know if i have ties to nola? no. but i do have a place to sleep, and i am in the a/c. i've been away from home, and have not known if i've had a home, MY home-- not my parents'-- to go back to. i've been at least in that position. that's why i can spend my evenings, my holiday weekend, my hard earned money volunteering.
brd2881 said:DanMav, pull your freakin nose outta Brett's a$$ and wipe the sh!t off of it.
kmac said:Snow,
I'll only argue one point with you. I have inferred that your experience of not having a shelter over your head, not eating, and downright just being miserable enable you to see an angle differently from those that have not. However, this does not given any more credence to your argument in terms of understanding or even why certain people in certain circumstances are reacting the way they are. There have been individuals in worse situations still doing the right thing. Shooting at a helicopter to get attention is still shooting at a helicopter. Stealing a CD player to sell on the black market is no less wrong than if it were stolen by some guy on a normal day to listen to music. The end does not "justify" the means. Sure one can argue that extreme situations call for extreme measures. Unfortunately criminals were criminals before Katrina (as has been previously argued). I'm not sure if experience (specifically yours, but applied liberally) really matters in judging an ethical argument (moral statement I realize).
On a more curiousity-sparked question, allow me to go back to the helicopter bit... I'm not a military-trained armed helicopter pilot. However, I'm pretty confident that they are not trained to be fired upon by Americans, in America. I have on the other hand seen the footage of what happens to people firing on US troops on the ground (in foreign lands). It didn't take for long that they weren't shooting any more. So how exactly is anyone shooting at a helicopter justifiable? Or maybe it's not, and maybe you're not trying to justify it. Can I get the limes yet?