Scary stuffThey’ll have the Tibetans and Uyghers ready to stab them in the back the moment they’re occupied looking somewhere else.
Scary stuffThey’ll have the Tibetans and Uyghers ready to stab them in the back the moment they’re occupied looking somewhere else.
I have a feeling that when he says “China Research Center” he really means a “Confucius Institute” much like this…China is green. That and diversity inclusion is why they’re winning influence. /China think tank expert
Sorry, it appears I deleted or edited out that the US has about 3600 combat aircraft (this doesn’t include attack helicopters or maritime patrol).
What I wonder about is will China be like Japan in that it takes them 60 years of modernization to achieve the military capabilities to really project power and then start using it. Japan started with the Meiji Restoration in 1868 and by the 1930s was engaging in imperialism. China started in 1978 with really modernizing, so give twenty more years of development. In terms of their not attacking because they are economically intertwined with the U.S., that is true, but unlike the Soviet Union, China is now headed by a dictator and if after Xi dies they have another dictator in the future, said dictator might decide that the economic cost of trying to take Taiwan is worth it.
Hey, wanna swap out your 1830 with an 1810? ?You’re completely anonymous here, that’s why. I’m sure you’re not the only annoying “academic” at your “four year institution.” I’ll go first… I work at NAWDC, in Fallon, NV. Specifically, I lead HAVOC. I’m in building 465C. Anyone on this forum can come to my office to visit, chat, or engage in professional discourse. I don’t know why you wouldn’t extend the same courtesy to us here.
It doesn’t matter. I noted our ability to move aircraft globally with unmatched aerial refueling capability. Also, our more substantial Pacific allies share not simply that capability but cross-National, shared standards.One thing, but is that the Navy in that region or U.S. combat aircraft overall...?
That position requires a Growler Intel O tour and a Growler Intel WTI patch. There are opportunities for 1810s at NAWDC though.Hey, wanna swap out your 1830 with an 1810? ?
I apologize. I didn’t realize that was required and I prefer to keep myself anonymous online. I don’t even do social media.You’re completely anonymous here, that’s why. I’m sure you’re not the only annoying “academic” at your “four year institution.” I’ll go first… I work at NAWDC, in Fallon, NV. Specifically, I lead HAVOC. I’m in building 465C. Anyone on this forum can come to my office to visit, chat, or engage in professional discourse. I don’t know why you wouldn’t extend the same courtesy to us here.
Like I said it’s a major risk for a full scale conflict for China. They want to be recognized as a world super power but if they get into a full scale conflict and the US decides that the only acceptable terms is full and unconditional surrender then China is going to basically face the end and they may not want that risk.
You ain’t ever been and will never be in Fallon. And the only beer you could offer Brett is whatever cheap shit you steal out of Mom and Dad’s fridge in the basement!I apologize. I didn’t realize that was required and I prefer to keep myself anonymous online. I don’t even do social media.
But next time I’m In Fallon I’ll stop by your desk to bother you and buy you a beer at the O club.
You ain’t ever been and will never be in Fallon. And the only beer you could offer Brett is whatever cheap shit you steal out of Mom and Dad’s fridge in the basement!
Go back to harassing your friends on Xbox!
It's not required, but I'd consider it "adult" and "professional." Fun fact, this is social media... and you're doing it right now.I apologize. I didn’t realize that was required and I prefer to keep myself anonymous online. I don’t even do social media.
But next time I’m In Fallon I’ll stop by your desk to bother you and buy you a beer at the O club.