I agree that it needs major changes. You spend more time talking about your family thatn you do yourself. While they were a major influence and I understand that you want the board to see where you desire to serve is rooted, spending 1/5 of your statement on gramp's bio seems ill-advised.
Also, your final paragraph is full of platitiudes and comes off as a contrived. "My attitude is something that makes me who I am, and that's all I know how to be." What?! Not only it is completely trite, it also doesn't actually say anything. What does that statement even me? That you can't be anyone but yourself? I'm pretty sure that a statement like this falls firmly under "needless to say". Charles Manson can't be anyone but who he is either. And I think the same it true for, well, everyone. Like with Grandpa's bio, this statement--and much of that paragraph--doesn't tell us anything about you or why you'd make a good officer.
And things like stating you've never failed (really? Never at anything? You didn't lose in the dodgeball tournament in 2nd grade, or fail to get the hot cheerleader you were lusting after to let you inside her sweater, or misspell 'circumlocutional' in a heartbreaking upset in the junior high spelling bee?) and that you don't plan on it now really are just empty platitudes.
Then there are some weird things, like the mention of your "route" without telling us what you do. Are you a newspaper delivery boy or one of those kids who rings my doorbell asking me to buy a cnady bar? You don't necessarily have to state what you do, but if you don't, then I think dangling info about your route without specifiying leaves a weirdly unanswered question.
And there are some weird grammar/usage issues in that paragraph. "...using the schooling the Navy has given my family already building atop with what started with my forefathers" The "already building atop with what "part is confusing and awkward and incorrect. This is also the sentence with the incorrect punctuation I referred to before.
In my (non-subject matter expert) opinion, the best statements have a unifying vision (or maybe 2-3 items, but they always have a focus). Like all those papers you've no doubt written in high school English class, they need to have a thesis, or at least an implicit thesis. Why do you want to be an officer, and what is it about you that you think makes you a strong candidate? Answer that, and you'll have your thesis/focus. Then write a statement where every sentence (heck, every phrase and even every word) furthers your goal of getting the board to see that focus. You don't have a lot of words to make this vision clear, so I mean it when I say that during your edits you need to look at each word and decide whether it is actively working for you.
It seems like you feel your family legacy is important, so that would be something to focus on. You've also got some unusual experience workin gin politics, and I get the sense you feel that is important and something that helps you stand out. So those are a place to start. Try writing a paragraph about family legacy (which mentions your grandfather and father, yet focuses on how their influence shaped you and how you have taken their stories and integrated them into your value system). Then write a paragraph about your experience at the good Senator's office, and tell us how that shaped you, how it stoked your desire to join the Navy, and how you can use those experiences if you are selected for a commission.
Do that, and you'll have a damn good start.
Also, your final paragraph is full of platitiudes and comes off as a contrived. "My attitude is something that makes me who I am, and that's all I know how to be." What?! Not only it is completely trite, it also doesn't actually say anything. What does that statement even me? That you can't be anyone but yourself? I'm pretty sure that a statement like this falls firmly under "needless to say". Charles Manson can't be anyone but who he is either. And I think the same it true for, well, everyone. Like with Grandpa's bio, this statement--and much of that paragraph--doesn't tell us anything about you or why you'd make a good officer.
And things like stating you've never failed (really? Never at anything? You didn't lose in the dodgeball tournament in 2nd grade, or fail to get the hot cheerleader you were lusting after to let you inside her sweater, or misspell 'circumlocutional' in a heartbreaking upset in the junior high spelling bee?) and that you don't plan on it now really are just empty platitudes.
Then there are some weird things, like the mention of your "route" without telling us what you do. Are you a newspaper delivery boy or one of those kids who rings my doorbell asking me to buy a cnady bar? You don't necessarily have to state what you do, but if you don't, then I think dangling info about your route without specifiying leaves a weirdly unanswered question.
And there are some weird grammar/usage issues in that paragraph. "...using the schooling the Navy has given my family already building atop with what started with my forefathers" The "already building atop with what "part is confusing and awkward and incorrect. This is also the sentence with the incorrect punctuation I referred to before.
In my (non-subject matter expert) opinion, the best statements have a unifying vision (or maybe 2-3 items, but they always have a focus). Like all those papers you've no doubt written in high school English class, they need to have a thesis, or at least an implicit thesis. Why do you want to be an officer, and what is it about you that you think makes you a strong candidate? Answer that, and you'll have your thesis/focus. Then write a statement where every sentence (heck, every phrase and even every word) furthers your goal of getting the board to see that focus. You don't have a lot of words to make this vision clear, so I mean it when I say that during your edits you need to look at each word and decide whether it is actively working for you.
It seems like you feel your family legacy is important, so that would be something to focus on. You've also got some unusual experience workin gin politics, and I get the sense you feel that is important and something that helps you stand out. So those are a place to start. Try writing a paragraph about family legacy (which mentions your grandfather and father, yet focuses on how their influence shaped you and how you have taken their stories and integrated them into your value system). Then write a paragraph about your experience at the good Senator's office, and tell us how that shaped you, how it stoked your desire to join the Navy, and how you can use those experiences if you are selected for a commission.
Do that, and you'll have a damn good start.