codtanker said:Back to the original topic, can a upcoming SNA have the option of paying for his own solo x-country and not have the "Ghost" with him? No matter what you think having a solo "SHOTGUN" is not a solo, it sucks. Most of the time you will find in CNATRA that you are shotgunned for weather and your pressed for training days to complete.
Bottom line is if you have the money, complete your private, and don't forget to do your multi-engine and single engine commercial when you get your wings.
zippy said:Talking to one guy comming from Pensacola, he said the school that he did IFS with mandated that they would not fly on their own outside of IFS while they were in it. Even if that was the case, they could just wait until they are finished- especially the way so many of the schools that do IFS offer those PPL completer courses.
BOMBSonHAWKEYES said:I disagree. Threre are many shining stars, but like any program, there are some that aren't.
TheBubba said:If you're a SNA, from what I understand, it's just better to wait till you're winged... that way all you need is a test and a check ride and the Navy pays for your flight time... Correct me if I'm wrong on that.
powder said:Bubba's right. IFS regs state you aren't allowed to fly outside of IFS. Now, whether or not people do it is another story. Someone made the point of being able to teach everyone to fly eventually, but the Navy wants to see if you have the aptitude to be able to do it in a certain number of flights, and that's probably the reasoning behind that policy.
powder said:Looking back on it, we can't believe they let us have a plane by ourselves and take it X-C at like ~18-20 hours of flight time. I'm sure it varies a bit, but I went through IFS at Quantico and I did not know a SINGLE emergency procedure. Not one. All I was taught was how to take off, basic airwork, and how to land (somewhat). Basically, the bare bones crap you need if EVERYTHING works perfectly throughout the whole flight. If absolutely anything out of the ordinary would have happened, I would have been f*cked. My instruction in the case of an emergency was literally "Grass, Gas," as in, find a landing site and then try to figure out what's wrong. The way IFS is run, it was just a matter of time. As far as knee-jerk reactions go, get used to it.
zippy said:Interesting... maybe they changed the regs since i did it, or we just missed it (it was our schools first crack at IFS- they were very familiar with the Air Forces IFT program though).
pilot_man said:Wow, what a hard head. Once you get done with ACM you can be this cocky. You read again young one, I didn't say you called him an idiot. My point was if it is a problem with the aircraft (engine failure), then it is a problem with the school and their maintenance program. I'll say it again, you didn't say his friend was an idiot JUST THAT MOST OF THE TIME CRASHES ARE CAUSED BY IDIOCY.
see you in the fleet :>
or which is the case most of the time "this person was an idiot", instead they think "oh my god, stop everything! ban it!"
jamnww said:When did you go through? It has been that way for at least 2 years now...
Fly Navy said:Ok, you got me there. I didn't explain clearly enough that I wasn't just talking about aviation mishaps when I said, and quote:
I never said "most of the time crashes are caused by idiocy". But, it was ambiguous, as I didn't clearly state that I wasn't just talking about crashes. Yes, saying that most crashes are caused by idiocy is off-base and it wasn't what I wanted to imply. I was referring to things such as parasailing with homemade gear.
That being said, the original problem was SuperFly seeing "Milton crash" and "idiot" in the same post and completely disregarding anything else that was said.
zippy said:Dude, just post bullet points from now on...