-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
The DEBATE: Round 2
- Thread starter A4sForever
- Start date
- Status
...and you realize that McCain said Warren Buffet, who just so happens to support Obama. Great answer
...and you realize that McCain said Warren Buffet, who just so happens to support Obama. Great answer
Just because a guy happens to vote differently than you doesn't mean he isn't the best solution for a problem...I think it showed maturity on his (Sen. McCain's) part, and a willingness to work on both sides of the aisle...
...and you realize that McCain said Warren Buffet, who just so happens to support Obama. Great answer
T. Boone Pickens would be an even better answer.
McCain is definitely on the offensive in a big way.
...and you realize that McCain said Warren Buffet, who just so happens to support Obama. Great answer
Actually he mentioned him and then made the point that he liked Meg Whitman.
Oh, of course :sleep_125
Yes, but he's not going to be a better democrat then Obama. If the guy would have stuck to conservatism and not voted for the bail out he would have been elected. But now it's OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOObama in 08 my friends. Count it. It's a done deal.
OOOHHH SNAP!! He dropped the Herbert Hoover card!!! There are like 8% of Americans who got that...
Neither of these guys seem to have a clue on the budget.
Sen Obama: "A hatchet but not a scalpel"
I am still interested where he wants to cut govt spending. He hasn't mentioned a single detail.
Sen McCain's idea of an across the board freeze isn't much better. That still leaves a half trillion dollar deficit.
Neither claims to be changing (increasing) tax revenue significantly to counter either.
Sen Obama: "A hatchet but not a scalpel"
I am still interested where he wants to cut govt spending. He hasn't mentioned a single detail.
Sen McCain's idea of an across the board freeze isn't much better. That still leaves a half trillion dollar deficit.
Neither claims to be changing (increasing) tax revenue significantly to counter either.
So you don't see a difference between thinking that Warren Buffett is qualified to run the treasury, and tacitly approving of his choice of president? He approves of his professional expertise, not of his vote.
Obama was the first to invoke 9/11. Huh.
OTOH, why exactly does defense and Veterans spending get a bye from McCain when it comes to sacrifices in spending and a possible spending freeze?
- Status