You apparently aren’t paying attention as to the why….maybe this will enlighten you on your previous comments.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
The end of NATO?
- Thread starter Waveoff
- Start date
Ian Bremmer has a hypothesis here:
That said, I expect this to blow over relatively soon - I suspect more people are looking at their March Madness bracket and who is the starting pitcher on Opening Day (Thursday) then cares what is happening in Yemen.
Ian Bremmer seems like a smart enough guy, but seems like he likes the smell of his own farts...big media trots him out to comment on anything/everything regarding anything international related....I said what I said and I don't get paid for it.
Spekkio
He bowls overhand.
This.
The instances where we hammer someone is not only when they create spillage, but they willfully attempt to give or sell it to someone who isn't cleared to have it, usually a foreign actor.
Which didn't happen in this case.
Which parts did you disagree with - and did you find any observations had merit?
What sources and / or analysts do you find informative?
Spekkio
He bowls overhand.
So something interesting I discussed that provides a common explanation of the Hillary case with this...
Government communications on official devices are subject to record keeping rules. Most of us peons think nothing of that when sending emails, but when your position is high in the political food chain, this poses a real personal and professional risk to you.
Meaning, Hillary, SECDEF, and whoever else has conducted official business on personal devices probably views their government provided devices as compromised - by that, I mean that their political opponents have access to use their communications against them at any time out of context.
So the risk of chatting details on personal devices 'just among us girls' is perceived as lower than that. Especially among the type of person who is power hungry yet perceives they have a lot of enemies inside the beltway.
Government communications on official devices are subject to record keeping rules. Most of us peons think nothing of that when sending emails, but when your position is high in the political food chain, this poses a real personal and professional risk to you.
Meaning, Hillary, SECDEF, and whoever else has conducted official business on personal devices probably views their government provided devices as compromised - by that, I mean that their political opponents have access to use their communications against them at any time out of context.
So the risk of chatting details on personal devices 'just among us girls' is perceived as lower than that. Especially among the type of person who is power hungry yet perceives they have a lot of enemies inside the beltway.
Oh don’t worry I’m sure admin will pester me every 18 months when it’s inspection season and I don’t have some dumb FOUO disclaimer in my signature block
Worth pausing to reflect on the magnificent, staring at the sun level of stupidity. Mind boggling stupidness. Lick a cattle prod level of stupid…
Trump…referring to him (Goldberg) in rallies and on social media as a “sleazebag,” “con man” and “slimeball reporter.”
Hegseth told reporters Monday that Goldberg was “a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again.” He added, “This is a guy that peddles in garbage.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X Tuesday that Goldberg is “well-known for his sensationalist spin.”
So little respect. And yet they invited him to a chat.
What could the Houthis have done with a two hour heads up of an incoming attack?
I hope Goldberg releases the chat.
Trump…referring to him (Goldberg) in rallies and on social media as a “sleazebag,” “con man” and “slimeball reporter.”
Hegseth told reporters Monday that Goldberg was “a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again.” He added, “This is a guy that peddles in garbage.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X Tuesday that Goldberg is “well-known for his sensationalist spin.”
So little respect. And yet they invited him to a chat.
What could the Houthis have done with a two hour heads up of an incoming attack?
I hope Goldberg releases the chat.
Someone needs to initiate a PI as to why the poster creator used the "FOUO" label and not "CUI" in violation of repeated trainings.
Folks with active clearances that are defending this jackassery are creating quite a bit of doubt about their own proficiency and trustworthiness WRT sensitive material - of really any classification level...