Item number two on this list is relevant here.
Just because some whack job in SF proposes something doesn't mean it's actually being done by decision makers, however suspicious we may be based on recent ship namings.
As for this rest of the homosexuality bit, let's keep it relevant to the military, and not based on our own personal beliefs, i.e. a discussion of DADT repeal and its effects on the military is legitimate, within proper bounds, but a discussion of its morality or whatever is best taken to another board. I say that knowing that I'd like to come at this debate with a baseball bat of self-righteousness at what I think is prejudice, but am trying to hold back. Like much in the military, you can have your own opinions, just as long as you don't let them affect your work. I just wonder how some people here are going to handle some of their troops who they regard as inherently "immoral," "deviant," or "pedophiles." You going to give them a fair shake?
Just because some whack job in SF proposes something doesn't mean it's actually being done by decision makers, however suspicious we may be based on recent ship namings.
As for this rest of the homosexuality bit, let's keep it relevant to the military, and not based on our own personal beliefs, i.e. a discussion of DADT repeal and its effects on the military is legitimate, within proper bounds, but a discussion of its morality or whatever is best taken to another board. I say that knowing that I'd like to come at this debate with a baseball bat of self-righteousness at what I think is prejudice, but am trying to hold back. Like much in the military, you can have your own opinions, just as long as you don't let them affect your work. I just wonder how some people here are going to handle some of their troops who they regard as inherently "immoral," "deviant," or "pedophiles." You going to give them a fair shake?